Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter Kwasniewski's avatar

While I am all in favor of the recovery of Latin and Gregorian chant, it must be said that, in all fairness, Paul VI was AT BEST an equivocal supporter of them, and at worst one who contributed mightily to their euthanization.

Pardon the lengthy quotation but here is Paul VI bidding farewell to Latin and chant in his (in)famous General Audience of November 26, 1969 -- literally days before the Novus Ordo was to go into effect:

<< 8. It is here that the greatest newness is going to be noticed, the newness of language. No longer Latin, but the spoken language will be the principal language of the Mass. The introduction of the vernacular will certainly be a great sacrifice for those who know the beauty, the power and the expressive sacrality of Latin. We are parting with the speech of the Christian centuries; we are becoming like profane intruders in the literary preserve of sacred utterance. We will lose a great part of that stupendous and incomparable artistic and spiritual thing, the Gregorian chant.

9. We have reason indeed for regret, reason almost for bewilderment. What can we put in the place of that language of the angels? We are giving up something of priceless worth. But why? What is more precious than these loftiest of our Church's values?

10. The answer will seem banal, prosaic. Yet it is a good answer, because it is human, because it is apostolic.

11. Understanding of prayer is worth more than the silken garments in which it is royally dressed. Participation by the people is worth more—particularly participation by modern people, so fond of plain language which is easily understood and converted into everyday speech.

12. If the divine Latin language kept us apart from the children, from youth, from the world of labor and of affairs, if it were a dark screen, not a clear window, would it be right for us fishers of souls to maintain it as the exclusive language of prayer and religious intercourse? What did St. Paul have to say about that? Read chapter 14 of the first letter to the Corinthians: "In Church I would rather speak five words with my mind, in order to instruct others, than ten thousand words in a tongue" (I Corinthians 14:19). >>

https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/changes-in-mass-for-greater-apostolate-8969

Moreover, when he published "Sacrificium Laudis" in 1966 to urge monks and nuns to retain their chanted choral office, Rembert Weakland went straight to him and said "This is not happening." And Paul VI backed off, as he so often did. A sign of how little the Vatican cares about that document is that it doesn't even appear in translation on the Vatican website. If you want to know what the pope wrote, you have to look for the translation at (you guessed it) The Latin Mass Society of England & Wales:

https://lms.org.uk/sacrificium_laudis

In short, Paul VI was a timid and non-committal pope, as Yves Chiron's biography shows, who could not quite make up his mind about what direction to go in; and this uncertainty and hesitation has remained a trait of Catholic liturgical life ever since.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts