Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John-Paul Mikolajczyk's avatar

Was Crystal Cathedral successfully converted? No. I'm sure that the renovation was designed with the latest trendy contemporary theory, so it's no wonder it falls somewhere between an airport terminal ticketing hall and HGTV. The comments from Father Locojano and Dana Gioia both demonstrate the logical fallacy of equivocation. What do the Pantheon and the Baths of Diocletian have in common with the former Crystal Cathedral? Other than the fact that they were formerly buildings of false religions and are now dedicated for worship in the one true religion of the Catholic Church, nothing. That is not an apples-to-apples comparison. What we're talking about here is design not use. They're related but distinct. The civic buildings of Greece and Rome were built with a humane - albeit incomplete - outlook that's part of what early Christians were able to include into our patrimony as they Christianized the world (think: Plato and Aristotle, for example). Christ Cathedral is a modernist building, built upon the loose soil of rejection of tradition, beauty, and itching for novelty. Do those things characterize offering to God the best of what we have in an act of the virtue of religion?

Expand full comment

No posts